Finally, someone speaks out strongly against the MSBS regarding licensing:
Some of those links are dead. The ones that live don't really settle the
matter, nor is this matter every likely to be setteled until someone
actually goes head to head with Microsoft (which is very unlikely to
happen). For fear of beating a dead dog - Ken Levy's "opinion" that the VFP
runtime files that a VFP app requires to run is considered a redistributable
file is not supported by the wording of the eula or the contents of
redist.txt. I've been saying this for a few years now, and the comments you
can find on the referenced website below say pretty much the same thing.
This is why we, and many others, have had this conversation over and over
again :-)
No comments:
Post a Comment